<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Toyota Adds 600,000 Vehicles To Recall</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lemonlaw.com/wordpress/toyota-adds-600000-vehicles-to-recall/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lemonlaw.com/wordpress/toyota-adds-600000-vehicles-to-recall/</link>
	<description>Lemon Law Information from the largest lemon law firm in Pennsylvania, New Jersey &#38; Northeast USA.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 23:12:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: LemonLaw</title>
		<link>http://www.lemonlaw.com/wordpress/toyota-adds-600000-vehicles-to-recall/#comment-4756</link>
		<dc:creator>LemonLaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2011 20:57:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lemonlaw.com/wordpress/?p=306#comment-4756</guid>
		<description>You are going to have to contact Toyota corporate directly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are going to have to contact Toyota corporate directly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Heidler</title>
		<link>http://www.lemonlaw.com/wordpress/toyota-adds-600000-vehicles-to-recall/#comment-4755</link>
		<dc:creator>James Heidler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2011 15:16:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lemonlaw.com/wordpress/?p=306#comment-4755</guid>
		<description>I own a 2005 Toyota Matrix.   The engine trouble light came on yesterday.  I took the car right away to Granville Toyota.  They diagnosed the car, got an error code P0456. They found that there is a small crack in the fuel filler pipe. The error code is the same as in the recall #EG051-06. The labour for diagnosing and fixing 2.30hr=$228.85 Parts$=206.80+ taxes and misc. total=$555.77. 

I thought that it was the ECU that was causing same problem again which was a recall and was replaced because the engine light was on and rough shifting. 
It took a long time to replace the ECU ever since I got the recall letter last year, and was only replaced when my cars engine trouble light came on and shifting was abrupt.
That happened and was corrected in February this year.

Now the gas filler pipe has a crack. How could that be? The car is only 6 years old and has only 63,905 KM. What’s next? Are Toyota now made to self destruct after five years which is the warranty limit?  
Is this a manufacturing defect?  

The car has only 63,905KM.
I believe the defect was already there the whole time from delivery but over time made it more pronounced. 
 
I saw on the internet a copy of a Toyota Technical Service BULLETIN
Dated: August 23, 2006 #EG051-06 
Title:
M.I.L. ON&quot; DTC P0440, P0441, P0442,
P0446, AND/OR P0456 	
FUEL FILLER TUBE IMPROVEMENT
Models:
’03 – ’04 Corolla &amp; Matrix (2WD), &amp; ’05 Matrix (4WD) 
Some 2003 – 2004 Corolla and Matrix 2WD and 2005 model year Matrix 4WD vehicles
may exhibit a M.I.L. “ON” condition with DTCs P0440, P0441, P0442, P0446, and/or
P0456 stored. An improved fuel filler tube has been developed to correct this condition.

Is this the same kind of fuel filler tube that was installed on my Matrix?

I am terribly disappointed.  I had a 1993 Toyota Corolla for 11 years and the only trouble I had was the engine timing belt which had to be replaced after 9 years.

I am extremely careful with my cars and I always put the gas station filler nozzle carefully to the gas tank when I fill up.

I am enclosing copy of recall and dealer invoice showing error codes.  Please provide me with an explanation.  I want to know why I had to pay $555 for a problem that seems to be the subject of a recall by Toyota and which was never made known to car owners.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I own a 2005 Toyota Matrix.   The engine trouble light came on yesterday.  I took the car right away to Granville Toyota.  They diagnosed the car, got an error code P0456. They found that there is a small crack in the fuel filler pipe. The error code is the same as in the recall #EG051-06. The labour for diagnosing and fixing 2.30hr=$228.85 Parts$=206.80+ taxes and misc. total=$555.77. </p>
<p>I thought that it was the ECU that was causing same problem again which was a recall and was replaced because the engine light was on and rough shifting.<br />
It took a long time to replace the ECU ever since I got the recall letter last year, and was only replaced when my cars engine trouble light came on and shifting was abrupt.<br />
That happened and was corrected in February this year.</p>
<p>Now the gas filler pipe has a crack. How could that be? The car is only 6 years old and has only 63,905 KM. What’s next? Are Toyota now made to self destruct after five years which is the warranty limit?<br />
Is this a manufacturing defect?  </p>
<p>The car has only 63,905KM.<br />
I believe the defect was already there the whole time from delivery but over time made it more pronounced. </p>
<p>I saw on the internet a copy of a Toyota Technical Service BULLETIN<br />
Dated: August 23, 2006 #EG051-06<br />
Title:<br />
M.I.L. ON&#8221; DTC P0440, P0441, P0442,<br />
P0446, AND/OR P0456<br />
FUEL FILLER TUBE IMPROVEMENT<br />
Models:<br />
’03 – ’04 Corolla &amp; Matrix (2WD), &amp; ’05 Matrix (4WD)<br />
Some 2003 – 2004 Corolla and Matrix 2WD and 2005 model year Matrix 4WD vehicles<br />
may exhibit a M.I.L. “ON” condition with DTCs P0440, P0441, P0442, P0446, and/or<br />
P0456 stored. An improved fuel filler tube has been developed to correct this condition.</p>
<p>Is this the same kind of fuel filler tube that was installed on my Matrix?</p>
<p>I am terribly disappointed.  I had a 1993 Toyota Corolla for 11 years and the only trouble I had was the engine timing belt which had to be replaced after 9 years.</p>
<p>I am extremely careful with my cars and I always put the gas station filler nozzle carefully to the gas tank when I fill up.</p>
<p>I am enclosing copy of recall and dealer invoice showing error codes.  Please provide me with an explanation.  I want to know why I had to pay $555 for a problem that seems to be the subject of a recall by Toyota and which was never made known to car owners.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sue</title>
		<link>http://www.lemonlaw.com/wordpress/toyota-adds-600000-vehicles-to-recall/#comment-1540</link>
		<dc:creator>Sue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 21:42:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lemonlaw.com/wordpress/?p=306#comment-1540</guid>
		<description>I just purchased a used 2010 Camry with 15,000 miles on it at the end of December.  I checked the VIN and it is subject to the recall.  Since the car has limited miles on it, and I purchased it 2 months ago, is there a good claim that they should replace it with a car of equal value that is not affected by the recall?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just purchased a used 2010 Camry with 15,000 miles on it at the end of December.  I checked the VIN and it is subject to the recall.  Since the car has limited miles on it, and I purchased it 2 months ago, is there a good claim that they should replace it with a car of equal value that is not affected by the recall?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Samuel Dodridge</title>
		<link>http://www.lemonlaw.com/wordpress/toyota-adds-600000-vehicles-to-recall/#comment-1482</link>
		<dc:creator>Samuel Dodridge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 06:22:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lemonlaw.com/wordpress/?p=306#comment-1482</guid>
		<description>I like the Sebring make, personally. The &#039;95-&#039;06 Cirrus/Sebrings were pretty cars, and were quite well viewed in its grade until Chrysler let the 2nd generation wither on the vine. Detroit has a nasty problem with hurling away brand awareness. They&#039;ll build up a good auto with a good-sounding name, then, not long after it becomes a household phrase, they allow the product go stale and the name becomes a punchline.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the Sebring make, personally. The &#8217;95-&#8217;06 Cirrus/Sebrings were pretty cars, and were quite well viewed in its grade until Chrysler let the 2nd generation wither on the vine. Detroit has a nasty problem with hurling away brand awareness. They&#8217;ll build up a good auto with a good-sounding name, then, not long after it becomes a household phrase, they allow the product go stale and the name becomes a punchline.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LemonLaw</title>
		<link>http://www.lemonlaw.com/wordpress/toyota-adds-600000-vehicles-to-recall/#comment-1430</link>
		<dc:creator>LemonLaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 19:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lemonlaw.com/wordpress/?p=306#comment-1430</guid>
		<description>Janice:  There are a lot of folks in the same situation and there is no way at this time Toyota is going to allow you to exchange the car.  Be mindful of the defect and your surroundings.  If you feel any sort of symptom, contact your service department asap.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Janice:  There are a lot of folks in the same situation and there is no way at this time Toyota is going to allow you to exchange the car.  Be mindful of the defect and your surroundings.  If you feel any sort of symptom, contact your service department asap.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Janice</title>
		<link>http://www.lemonlaw.com/wordpress/toyota-adds-600000-vehicles-to-recall/#comment-1429</link>
		<dc:creator>Janice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 17:39:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lemonlaw.com/wordpress/?p=306#comment-1429</guid>
		<description>What if I feel the pedal fix is not really fixing the problem? I have heard by quite a few people that they think it is a software problem, and not a pedal problem. I have only had my car for 5 months but am wondering if I can bring it back to Toyota and exchange it for a car that is not affected by this problem</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What if I feel the pedal fix is not really fixing the problem? I have heard by quite a few people that they think it is a software problem, and not a pedal problem. I have only had my car for 5 months but am wondering if I can bring it back to Toyota and exchange it for a car that is not affected by this problem</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maria Fluegge</title>
		<link>http://www.lemonlaw.com/wordpress/toyota-adds-600000-vehicles-to-recall/#comment-1411</link>
		<dc:creator>Maria Fluegge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 01:03:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lemonlaw.com/wordpress/?p=306#comment-1411</guid>
		<description>Hey Brian, will it irk you that the supplier Toyota is blaming this on has the same name as arguably the best automobile their range one rival makes? How much weird conspiracy theory does a moron like you create out of that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Brian, will it irk you that the supplier Toyota is blaming this on has the same name as arguably the best automobile their range one rival makes? How much weird conspiracy theory does a moron like you create out of that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

