<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Your Ram Rambunctious?  Chrysler Cancels Cummins Contract.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lemonlaw.com/wordpress/is-your-ram-rambunctious-chrysler-cancels-cummins-contract/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lemonlaw.com/wordpress/is-your-ram-rambunctious-chrysler-cancels-cummins-contract/</link>
	<description>Lemon Law Information from the largest lemon law firm in Pennsylvania, New Jersey &#38; Northeast USA.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 16:45:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: LemonLaw</title>
		<link>http://www.lemonlaw.com/wordpress/is-your-ram-rambunctious-chrysler-cancels-cummins-contract/#comment-3233</link>
		<dc:creator>LemonLaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2011 19:58:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lemonlaw.com/wordpress/?p=206#comment-3233</guid>
		<description>Nathen:  Please call the AZ lemon law firm of Krohn &amp; Moss at 1-800 US LEMON to discuss this situation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nathen:  Please call the AZ lemon law firm of Krohn &amp; Moss at 1-800 US LEMON to discuss this situation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathen Brill</title>
		<link>http://www.lemonlaw.com/wordpress/is-your-ram-rambunctious-chrysler-cancels-cummins-contract/#comment-3213</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathen Brill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Dec 2010 18:58:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lemonlaw.com/wordpress/?p=206#comment-3213</guid>
		<description>I wanted to find out if my 2008 Dodge Cummins would qualify as a lemon based on the sheer number of defects in a 90 period?  I have read the AZ Lemon Laws and I don&#039;t qualify under those specific guidelines, but my truck has been to the dealer now 6 times since I bought it in October of 2010.  Here is the list of items that have been repaired or replaced in the last 90 days, in no particular order:

1. Replace Intermediate shaft in steering linkage.
2. Replaced tie rod ends
3. Replaced pitman arm
4. Upgraded steering system from 09 models.
5. Replaced FIPM because it was faulty
6. Replaced speed sensor
7. Removed and installed insulation and mounting hardware for both front driver door panels.
8. Replaced both batteries.
9. Replaced third brake light and gasket due to leaking in cab. 
Note: I just got my truck back on Tuesday for a host of warranty items which included the water leaking into the cab at the rear of the truck roof. Noticed it leaking again yesterday. 
10. Replaced both front wheel bearings and hubs.
11. Replaced hardware on DPF line.

It is currently sitting at the dealership as I type getting the roof leak fixed a second time.  I also noticed that it has a problem with the transmission slipping.  It may need a new transmission now.  It also has been getting progressively worse and worse fuel milage since I bought it.  The power of the motor also seems to be decreasing, but this may be due to a bad transmission.  

So as you can see, My issues dont exactly put me in the catagory for a Lemon, but based on the number of defects I have experienced with this truck, it is way too many for a &quot;Certified Used Vehicle&quot;.  I feel I have a case for a dealer buyback.  THoughts?

Frustrated, dissapointed, and bummed,
N.B.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wanted to find out if my 2008 Dodge Cummins would qualify as a lemon based on the sheer number of defects in a 90 period?  I have read the AZ Lemon Laws and I don&#8217;t qualify under those specific guidelines, but my truck has been to the dealer now 6 times since I bought it in October of 2010.  Here is the list of items that have been repaired or replaced in the last 90 days, in no particular order:</p>
<p>1. Replace Intermediate shaft in steering linkage.<br />
2. Replaced tie rod ends<br />
3. Replaced pitman arm<br />
4. Upgraded steering system from 09 models.<br />
5. Replaced FIPM because it was faulty<br />
6. Replaced speed sensor<br />
7. Removed and installed insulation and mounting hardware for both front driver door panels.<br />
8. Replaced both batteries.<br />
9. Replaced third brake light and gasket due to leaking in cab.<br />
Note: I just got my truck back on Tuesday for a host of warranty items which included the water leaking into the cab at the rear of the truck roof. Noticed it leaking again yesterday.<br />
10. Replaced both front wheel bearings and hubs.<br />
11. Replaced hardware on DPF line.</p>
<p>It is currently sitting at the dealership as I type getting the roof leak fixed a second time.  I also noticed that it has a problem with the transmission slipping.  It may need a new transmission now.  It also has been getting progressively worse and worse fuel milage since I bought it.  The power of the motor also seems to be decreasing, but this may be due to a bad transmission.  </p>
<p>So as you can see, My issues dont exactly put me in the catagory for a Lemon, but based on the number of defects I have experienced with this truck, it is way too many for a &#8220;Certified Used Vehicle&#8221;.  I feel I have a case for a dealer buyback.  THoughts?</p>
<p>Frustrated, dissapointed, and bummed,<br />
N.B.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

