Lemon Law Blog

Good news for GM Owners–In the company’s proposed Master Transaction Agreement, it specifically says that GM “will continue to accept all liabilities under express written and limited new vehicle warranties, certified used vehicle warranties, and pre-owned vehicles warranties delivered in connection with the sale of new, certified used, or pre-owned vehicles manufactured or sold by Sellers or Purchaser prior to or after the closing.”

What does that mean exactly?  It means that unlike the previous Chrysler bankruptcy, where lemon law representation was temporarily stayed and settlement checks were bounced, General Motors is still devoted to assisting any clients who suffer repeated problems under warranty, knowing that continued customer loyalty will result in a resurgence of the brand.

Our Firm is still handling lemon law and breach of warranty claims for all General Motors drivers in Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Delaware, Ohio, New York, Connecticut, Massachusetts, and New Hampshire. We have a system in place where we can advocate quickly for our clients’ rights, with cases being expedited efficiently.  We have been assured that GM is committed to making sure this continues and we applaud the company for continuing to make consumers’ rights a priority.

Popularity: 10% [?]

It’s a sad day in the history of automobiles.  Autoblog reports that General Motors will phase out Pontiac by the end of 2010, and will build its accelerated visibility plan surrounding its four remaining brands:  Chevrolet, Buick, GMC and Cadillac.  By the end of the year, we will also know if and how GM will move forward with the Saab, Saturn and Hummer brands.

The first Pontiacs were produced in 1926 and their popularity has escalated throughout the decades with the production of the Bonneville, GTO, Firebird, and in later years the G6 and Solstice.

So, what does this mean if you have a Pontiac?  Ideally, this situation should not have any effect on your manufacturers warranty or in filing a lemon law or breach of warranty claim if in fact GM cannot fix a non-conformity despite numerous repair attempts.  It appears General Motors is standing behind the brand and its warranty and will continue to do so until the make phases out.

And while the value of the vehicles will certainly diminish come trade-in time, if you like the model, now may be a time you can take advantage of the situation and purchase one for a very reasonable price.

Popularity: 6% [?]

Mr. Rapkin: I would just like to say thank you for the work you have done to get my vehicle problems settled.  Chrysler initially offered me $1000.00 plus vehicle repairs, but you pushed on and got the settlement I wanted: Chrysler is repurchasing their mistake!!!  Thank you so much.  This situation was getting to be very frustrating.  I’m very pleased with what you have accomplished for my family and myself.  Thanks again.  Warm regards, Bobbie M.

Dear Fred:   I have received my settlement check and would like to thank you and your firm for time and effort put into my case. I will recommend your firm to friends who have similar problems with their autos, Thanks again.  Ted S.

To whom it may concern: I just wanted to thank all involved at the partnership of Kimmel and Silverman for a very competent and professional experience resolving the problems with my 2008 Ford F450. Robert Rapkin, Tiffany DiDomenico and the others involved in my case were very helpful and knowledgeable and facilitated resolution in a very admirable manner. I have already referred your firm to a neighbor with a similar vehicle and will continue to do so in the future. Once again, thanks for a very high quality experience.  Phil W.

To Michael Sacks, I have had problems with my 2007 Chevy Tahoe, and I did not know where to turn. A friend of mine told me to contact Kimmel and Silverman. I was assigned Bob Silverman. I am writing to tell you what an absolute joy it was to deal with Bob. He handled my situation in a very professional manner with my interests the only priority. I was very aggravated to say the least that General Motors Corporate would not contact me. He gave me excellent advice and I received a substantial compensation for General Motors negligence. I suppose that is why it is his company. I will gladly refer anyone in a similar situation. Hats off to Kimmel and Silverman. Thank you very much. Sincerly, Lawrence M.

Tracey, I just wanted to express my thanks to you, Patricia Murray and Mr. Silverman this year. My claim was 06 cobalt, I filed this year.  Anyways a quick update, I took my $ and literally ran to the nearest Toyota dealer,  Then I was ready to trade that bad cobalt and the key was stuck!! It was never ending. Because of your law firm, I now have a 08 beautiful Scion .   I might not be alive if it wasn’t for you law firm representing me. I took a big loss obviously since I only had the car 2 years but you guys helped me so much. I can’t believe I am outraged now that GM is broke, after I almost lost my life with that car, and then negative equity with the trade in. Now maybe we are bailing them out too? It’s a hard reality but the great news is how you guys treated me.  A painful experience turned into a painless one by your law firm.  Patricia                                                                                 

Popularity: 8% [?]

If you have been watching the news today, I am sure you have heard the news that President Bush will be lending Chrysler and General Motors up to $17.4 billion in short term loans from the US government.  The package does come with strings attached; they expect the manufacturers to be viable by the end of March and they put significant limits on executive pay and prohibit either company from issuing new dividends.  

So, what does this mean exactly?  It seems the ball is back in the manufacturers’ court and they have to figure out a way to significantly cut company debt.  Expect to see dealerships continue to close, service personnel to dwindle significantly, and the quality of warranty repairs, coupled with time allotted to warranty repairs, to be severely threatened.  But what is the alternative?  As the President pointed out this morning in his address, if either company declared bankruptcy, their service contracts and warranty obligations would not be a main priority.

Automotive Consumer Advocate and 1-800-LEMON LAW Communications Director Michael Sacks will be discussing the bleak auto industry outlook and answering automotive warranty questions tomorrow morning at 11am on Consumer Hotline on WDEL AM, 1150 on the dial in Wilmington, Delaware.  Last time, Michael appeared on the program, a caller phoned in with a Volvo problem and ended up $7,000 richer, so it pays to listen. 

Also, everyone’s a member of Facebook these days, even the gang at 1-800 LEMON LAW. If you are a client, former client, or just a fan of our services, we invite you to our new Facebook page and become a fan.  

Popularity: 7% [?]

As the big three continue their quest for the $34 billion bailout, Chrysler and GM are being pressured by lawmakers to revisit the possibility of merging.   Edmunds is reporting that a number of dealers, suppliers and others staged a rally in favor of the merge this morning near the steps of the U.S. Capital.

Lawmakers argue that if Chrysler and GM do merge, they will require less federal aid and speed up industry consolidation. There is a chance a merger would be a condition if they receive federal aid.

Lemon Law Attorney Bob Silverman appeared on WYOU Interactive News Wednesday Night in Wilkes Barre, PA and discussed the bailout. While many folks are against the rescue plan, there is no question that a bankruptcy would not only continue to wreak havoc on our economy and add millions to those on the unemployment line, but also cause many more dealerships to close.  These dealer closures are already leaving many drivers stranded, travelling hundreds of miles for warranty repairs, and waiting for inspection stickers and registration renewals. Next week, we will be providing tips on how to deal with the dealers during this difficult time.

Popularity: 6% [?]

When Bob Silverman & Craig Kimmel formed Kimmel & Silverman eighteen years ago, they had one goal in mind–to equal the playing field between the consumer and the billion-dollar automotive manufacturer, using State & Federal Laws that many consumers were not aware of.  Best of all, the legal help under these laws is completely FREE to the consumer. 

For the life of us, we cannot understand why consumers still insist on trying to do this by themselves, when you can have access to an experienced attorney who has worked on thousands of lemon law and breach of warranty claims (not only that, but we have three ASE-certified mechanics on staff to inspect our clients’ vehicles and research their issues.)  The other day, a gentleman called with a real problem–he was two years into a four-year lease and he was experiencing many problems with his power-train.  Being that he thought he had a “slam dunk” case, he decided to represent himself through the NJ Lemon Law unit.  He couldn’t get a mechanic to testify on his behalf. The manufacturer hired attorneys to oppose his claim.  He ended being offered a very minimal settlement which only covered a few lease payments.  He now has decided to buy himself out of his lease, which means he is going to take a huge financial hit.  This is all because he thought he could handle this on his own.  We have seen many other claims where the consumer was promised a new car, only it turned out to be a trade and the consumer found themselves stuck in a terrible situation.  If you are not a doctor, can you diagnose someone with a chest pain? If you are not a contractor, can you build a house and ensure it’s going to last the test of time?  The legal help is free, the participation is minimal.  You can keep driving your car throughout the entire process….if you don’t take advantage of what the Law provides, then you are partly to blame for whatever happens.

We know that It sounds too good to be true, but we can assure you it is for real. You can read the many consumer stories we have in our on-line newsroom, or just take a look at some of our recent victories from the last quarter. The following are some of the repurchases we have successfully obtained in the last four months.  These clients received all taxes, tags, finance charges, monthly payments and value on their trade-ins, minus a very small mileage offset normally based on the mileage when they first brought the car to the authorized manufacturers dealership for service.  And how much did they pay for legal fees?  if you answered “nothing,” you get a gold star!

• 2007 Nissan Quest — repurchase under MA Lemon Law
• 2008 Nissan XTerra — repurchase under PA Lemon Law
• 2007 Nissan Quest — repurchase under NJ Lemon Law
• 2005 Nissan Murano — repurchase under PA Lemon Law (client had 26,800 miles when he called us.)
• 2005 Nissan Altima — repurchase under PA Lemon Law (client had 30,126 miles when he called us.)
• 2007 Chevrolet Silverado — Two repurchases in last four months under PA Lemon Law
• 2008 Chevrolet Colorado — repurchase under PA Lemon Law
• 2008 Chevrolet HHR — repurchase under NJ Lemon Law (settled in 28 days)
• 2007 Chevrolet Trailblazer — repurchase under PA Lemon Law (settled in 19 days)
• 2008 Chevrolet Cobalt — repurchase under NJ Lemon Law
• 2007 GMC Sierra — repurchase under NJ Lemon Law
• 2007 GMC Yukon — repurchase under PA Lemon Law (settled in 20 days)
• 2008 GMC Arcadia — repurchase under NJ Lemon Law (settled in 27 days)
• 2007 GMC Arcadia — repurchase under DE Lemon Law
• 2008 GMC Envoy — repurchase under OH Lemon Law (settled in 19 days)
• 2008 GMC Yukon — repurchase under OH Lemon Law
• 2006 Cadillac CTS — repurchase under PA Lemon Law
• 2007 Cadillac SRX — repurchase under MA Lemon Law
• 2006 Cadillac XLRV — repurchase under MA Lemon Law
• 2008 Cadillac CTS — repurchase under NJ Lemon Law
• 2008 Saturn Vue — repurchase under PA Lemon Law (settled in 12 days)
• 2008 Saturn ION — repurchase under PA Lemon Law
• 2007 Saturn ION — repurchase under PA Lemon Law
• 2008 Hummer H3 — repurchase under NJ Lemon Law
• 2006 Suzuki Forenza — repurchase under VT Lemon Law
• 2008 Audi A4 — repurchase under NH Lemon Law
• 2006 Hyundai Elantra — repurchase under PA Lemon Law
• 2007 Dodge Ram — Two repurchases under PA Lemon Law
• 2007 Dodge Ram — Two repurchases under VT Lemon Law
• 2008 Dodge Ram – repurchase under PA Lemon Law
• 2007 Dodge Caliber — repurchase under PA Lemon Law
• 2008 Dodge Caliber –repurchase under PA Lemon Law
• 2008 Dodge Grand Caravan — repurchase under NJ Lemon Law
• 2008 Chrysler Sebring Convertible — repurchase under OH Lemon Law
• 2008 Chrysler Sebring Convertible — repurchase under PA Lemon Law
• 2007 Chrysler Town & Country — repurchase under PA Lemon Law
• 2008 Jeep Patriot — repurchase under PA Lemon Law
• 2006 Jeep Wrangler — repurchase under OH Lemon Law
• 2007 Jeep Commander — repurchase under OH Lemon Law
• 2007 Jeep Wrangler — repurchase under NJ Lemon Law
• 2006 Toyota Scion — repurchase under PA Lemon Law
• 2007 Toyota Solara –repurchase under PA Lemon Law
• 2008 Toyota Corolla — repurchase under PA Lemon Law
• 2008 Lexus LS460 — repurchase under NJ Lemon Law
• 2007 Lexus ES350 –repurchase under PA Lemon Law
• 2006 Lexus LX470 — repurchase under NJ Lemon Law
• 2007 Lexus GS300 — repurchase under PA Lemon Law
• 2008 Lexus GS400 — repurchase under OH Lemon Law
• 2005 Ford Mustang — repurchase under PA Lemon Law

Now, remember this is a legal process, so we can’t guarantee that you will receive a repurchase if you open a claim with us, but it could be possible.

Under the Laws we work with, a repurchase is the maximum remedy a consumer can receive.  Repurchases are reserved where the consumer has suffered a significant non-conformity which has affected the use, value and safety of the vehicle, and the problem has reoccurred repeatedly.  Another possible remedy under the Lemon Law is a new car. This known as an MSRP to MSRP swap, which is essentially a trade without the depreciation you would normally suffer.  As you know, the minute you drive a car off the lot, the value of the car depreciates significantly.  If you receive a swap, we take the MSRP from the sticker price of your car and apply it to the MSRP of a brand new car.  So, essentially you are getting a brand new car with the same features, and you have the same amount of equity in the new car as you did in the old car. The depreciation you would normally deal with does not apply.

There is also a third remedy under the State Lemon Laws and most commonly under the Federal Magnuson Moss Warranty Act–significant monetary compensation to reflect the diminished value of the vehicle for the problems you have incurred. This could apply if it is fixed after three repairs; if the problem is not threatening the overall use, value, or safety f the vehicle (i.e. radio);  it falls outside the lemon law mileage provisions; or if you purchased the car used but it still has a manufacturers warranty.  If you receive money, it is non-taxable and YOU GET TO KEEP YOUR CAR and your car is not branded in any way, shape or form.  Plus, your warranty remains completely in effect, so the manufacturer  is  still obligated to fix the car if problems persist, and you do not need to disclose that you received this money at time of trade or sale.  You may do whatever you want with the money.  You may have previously read in our blog about the Volvo SUV owner who received $7,000 after he heard Communications Director Michael Sacks on the radio. Here are some other folks who received monetary awards in the last four months(All of these folks kept their vehicles and had their attorney fees paid sepearately by the manufacturer):

• 2008 Volvo C70 — problems with convertible top, fixed after 4th attempt. Client received $10,000.
• 2008 Ford Ranger — client received $5,000.
• 2007 Ford Expedition — client received $6,000.
• 2005 Ford F350 — client received $7,000.
• 2007 Ford Expedition – client received $4,000.
• 2008 Toyota Rav 4 — client received $5,500.
• 2009 Dodge Journey purchased in another state but registered in PA — client received $6,750.
• 2006 Dodge Caravan –client received $5,250.
• 2007 Jeep Liberty — client received $5,000.
• 2006 Chrysler Town & Country with 32,000 miles — client received $3,250.
• 2006 Subaru Forrester with 61,000 miles — client received $4,000 (settled in 60 days).
• 2008 Land Rover LR 3 with 25,000 miles — client received $4,250.
• 2008 Saab 9-7 with 37,000 miles — client received $5,500.
• 2005 Saab 9-3 with 40,000 miles and the lease almost completed — client received $3,000.
• 2005 Mazda 3 with 50,536 miles — client received $4,000.
• 2006 Mazda 6 purchased used — client received $4,000.
• 2006 Mazda MPV — client received $4,500 (settled in 30 days).
• 2007 Mazda CX9 –client received $5,000 (settled in 45 days).
• 2006 Honda Civic with 32,700 miles, problems fell outside of lemon law — client received $3,500.
• 2005 Chevrolet Tahoe with problem starting at 29,000 miles and lease up – client received $4,000.
• 2005 Chevrolet Impala with problem starting at 25,000 miles — client received $3,000.
• 2004 BMW 7-series certified pre-owned with 56,600 miles — client received $2,500.
• 2004 BMW 5-series with problem starting at 52,000 miles & extended wty – client received $3,000.

And this is just a sampling of the work we have done in the last four months.  Think you have a lemon?    E-mail us you question or call us at 1-800 LEMON LAW (1-800-536-6652) and we will be happy to go over your situation and whether we can help.

Popularity: 43% [?]