Lemon Law Blog

Information and discussions about the Lemon Law, the Magnuson Moss statute, and Dealer Fraud. Provided by Kimmel and Silverman.
Subscribe

Archive for the ‘used cars’

Philly Council Passes Used Car Bill

May 20, 2008 By: LemonLaw Category: Defective Car, Magnuson Moss, PA Lemon Law, Pennsylvania Lemon Law, Used Car Lemon Law, consumer rights, legislation, used cars No Comments →

At 1-800-LEMON LAW, we receive countless calls from folks who purchased a used car and ended up being taken for a ride. Sometimes the car has a salvage title, or it will not pass inspection, or it just falls apart. Many times, these distressed drivers have little or no protection under the State and Federal Laws we work with. Now, Mayor Nutter’s consumer advocate Lance Haver is working hard to change that in Philadelphia.

This past Monday, The Philadelphia City Council has approved a lemon law bill for used cars, and if that bill becomes law, drivers will have 72 hours to get their car checked out by a mechanic following the purchase. If the car is not drivable, the dealer will either have to fix the problem or allow the consumer to return the car for a full refund.

This is a bill whose time has come, according to Kimmel & Silverman Founding Attorney Craig Thor Kimmel. “In Philadelphia, used car sales occur with greater frequency than in less populated areas for the simple fact that insurance on a used car in the city is cheaper than insurance on a new car. Often people who buy used must rely entirely on what they are told from their salesperson, as there is little or no warranty remaining. In the case of new cars, repairs are covered under warranty for free but sadly, that is not often the case for used cars. Avoiding an unreliable car and its high repair bills is critical. This type of consumer protection would certainly be welcomed.”

As you know, the Pennsylvania Lemon Law currently does not apply to used cars. However, if you are under a manufacturer’s warranty and you have been back three or more times, you could be entitled to monetary damages under a Federal law known as the Magnuson Moss Warranty Act. Like the Lemon Law, representation under this Law is completely cost-free. For more information, call us at 1-800 LEMON LAW or visit www.lemonlaw.com.

Popularity: 29% [?]

Heading out to a “once-in-a-lifetime” dealership event to buy a car? Watch NBC10 today at 4pm

March 21, 2008 By: LemonLaw Category: TV interview, dealership incentives, used cars No Comments →

Attention viewers in Philadelphia and the Delaware Valley: You see the advetorials in the Philadelphia Inquirer and receive the solicitations in the mail.  It’s a once-in-a-lifetime event at a local dealership, with pricing and financing deals that are so unbelievable, they can’t even print the terms. Sounds a like a great deal, right?  STOP.  Before you grab your checkbook and head to the dealer, watch “All That & More” today at 4pm on NBC10.  K&S Lemon Law Attorney Craig Kimmel has some words of wisdom to make sure you are not taken for a ride.  

Popularity: 25% [?]

Honda Accord Tops The List for Quality Used Cars

March 19, 2008 By: LemonLaw Category: Car Buying, Honda, Warranty, used cars No Comments →

By Jacqueline Mitchell, Forbes.com

Think about a used car and you might think junky, dirty and old. But another market is catching the attention of savvy buyers who want updated rides without paying new-car prices.

These certified used or certified “pre-owned” (CPO) vehicles have been inspected and refurbished by the manufacturer and are backed by extended warranties. The certified used car market isn’t one that automakers can afford to ignore. According to a recent J.D. Power and Associates study, sales of certified used cars have increased 46% since 2000. Auto experts estimate that 1.6 million certified used cars are sold annually, a number equivalent to 10% of new vehicle sales. This rapid growth started when the segment emerged in the 1990s. Luxury automakers like Mercedes-Benz, BMW and Lexus, looking for ways to unload vehicles coming off lease programs, introduced the certified pre-owned programs as a way to attract the discerning buyer who wanted a luxury car but didn’t want to shell out the big bucks. Other luxury and non-luxury automakers who found themselves in similar situations began offering their versions of these programs. Smart car buyers like them, too. Now, with this best-and-worst list of certified used cars from Forbes.com, smart buyers can be even smarter about this growing market segment.

Kelley Blue Book experts say new vehicle prices average $35,000 and depreciate at a rate of about 20% a year. With this in mind, the cost involved with the inspection, refurbishment and warranty of a certified pre-owned vehicle may add up to a better purchase package than buying a brand new car. “CPO cars are selected from the best of the best,” says Micah Muzio, video road-test editor of Kelley Blue Book. “Automakers can sell them for a premium, usually about $3,000 more than a used (non-certified) car. But the customer gets peace of mind, because the vehicle has been inspected and it’s backed by an extended warranty.”

But don’t rush out and purchase or lease just any vehicle wearing a CPO badge. The programs vary by automaker — and the quality of the vehicles is just as diverse. We looked at a combination of measures to find the best and worst certified used cars on the market, including Consumer Reports’ used-car verdict scores, the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety for crash test ratings and manufacturer-backed warranty programs.Topping our list of the Best CPO vehicles are the Honda Accord, Toyota 4Runner, Acura TL, Subaru Impreza and Lexus GS.

Making our list of the Worst CPO vehicles are the Saturn Relay, Jeep Grand Cherokee, Pontiac G6, Volkswagen New Beetle and Mercedes-Benz E Class.Vehicles that weren’t at the top of class as new car purchases won’t emerge at the top as stellar CPOs, Muzio says. The Relay, New Beetle and E Class, for example, are aging, older models; the Pontiac G6, while fairly new, isn’t a big seller in the segment for family cars. And the Jeep Grand Cherokee has struggled in the highly competitive SUV market.

To get a comprehensive list, we did not use multiple vehicles from one brand, but took the best of the bunch. So if one company had two vehicles that could make the list, we chose the top-ranked car from that brand, based on our measures, to include on the list. We did not include vehicles that had been significantly redesigned for 2008, and we excluded vehicles that did not have complete reporting data for safety or Consumer Reports’ used-car verdicts.

Those used-car verdicts are based on reliability history in 17 areas, ranging from the engine, transmission, and brakes to power equipment and the electrical system. Consumer Reports provides the data, where available, dating back to 1998. We used data for a three-year period spanning 2005 through 2007, as data for a five-year period was not always complete. The highest possible score a vehicle could earn over that time period is 15, or five points for each of the three years. We considered only vehicles with a total of 13 points or greater for the “best” list; a cutoff of seven points or less was used to determine the “worst.”

The only vehicle making our list with a score of 15 is the Honda Accord. The vehicles with the lowest score are the Saturn Relay and Jeep Grand Cherokee, both tying with a score of three.Keep in mind a score of 15 doesn’t mean that the vehicle is problem-free; it just means that it has relatively fewer problems compared with other models. And a score of three doesn’t mean a vehicle is unreliable; it merely has a higher rate of problems than the average model.

Safety was another key factor. Using information from the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, we were able to find historical crash test ratings. All the vehicles that made the “best” list have safety ratings of “good” for both frontal-offset and side-impact crash tests for the three model years considered.

The vehicles on the “worst” list all earned “good” ratings in frontal-offset testing, but earned scores of less than “good” for side impacts. The lowest score was “poor” — for the Volkswagen New Beetle. The Saturn Relay, depending on the year, had scores of “average,” “marginal” or “poor.”

We looked at the extended standard warranty and the number of points inspected, which range from 75 to 165. For the best, we used a cutoff of 150 points or higher; for the worst, 130 points and below. The length of time of an extended standard warranty and additional benefits were taken into consideration, but were not as heavily weighted as the number of inspection points, crash-test ratings and reliability history. All extended standard warranties kick in when the original manufacturer warranties expire; if the original has already expired, the new warranty goes into effect at the time the CPO vehicle is purchased. This information is available at the manufacturers’ websites and the Kelley Blue Book site.

The CPO Acura TL includes 24-hour roadside assistance, 24-hour emergency towing services, emergency fuel delivery and emergency lock-out service as part of its 12-month/12,000-mile extended warranty.

The CPO Lexus GS comes with a loaner car, 24-hour roadside assistance and trip interruption service (If your vehicle breaks down while you are away from home, this will cover reimbursement for meals, lodging and rental for a certain period of time, while your car is under repair) under its three-year/100,000-mile standard warranty. Some vehicles making our “worst” list also offered some added benefits under standard warranty plans. The CPO Pontiac G6 standard warranty includes 24-hour roadside assistance, a three-day, 150-mile satisfaction guarantee and a vehicle history report that details any past accidents, damage or “lemon” history.

With the information you need guiding you to the right CPO vehicle, you just might be able to slide behind the wheel of your dream car sooner than you think.

Popularity: 27% [?]

Where Do Lemon Cars Go?: Interesting NY Times Story on Laundered Lemons

September 01, 2007 By: LemonLaw Category: Car Lemon Law, Defective Car, Kimmel and Silverman, Pennsylvania Lemon Law, Vehicle Fraud, lemon buybacks, used cars 2 Comments →

Ever wonder what happens to lemon cars once they are bought back by the manufacturer? Last Sunday, The New York Times printed an interesting story which should shed some light on this mystery.

ManyPennsylvania consumers are unaware that in 2002, K&S Attorney Craig Thor Kimmel worked with the Pennsyvlania House of Representatives’ Consumer Affairs Committee to ammend the lemon law to include tighter title provisions for used cars.  Here’s the press release from our news room:

PA LEMON LAW TAKES EFFECT TODAY

New Pennsylvania Lemon Law Will Require Dealers, Lessors, and Transferors To Disclose If Used Car Has Lemon History

Harrisburg, PA (December 2,2002) - A new change to the Pennsylvania Lemon Law to help used car consumers takes place today. House Bill 767, a measure to protect used car buyers from purchasing lemon buybacks without full disclosure, was signed by Governor Mark Schweiker in October and goes into effect today. The change marks the second major amendment to the Pennsylvania Lemon Law Statute in the past year; the first being the expansion of the Law to include leased cars. Pennsylvania is the first state to take this type of action.

Until now, if a car was bought back by the manufacturer under the Pennsylvania Lemon Law, the manufacturer must fix the car, and place a sticker on the window notifying the next purchaser of its history. The manufacturer must also provide a 12 month, 12,000 mile warranty for the vehicle at no charge. Representative John R. Evans (R-District 5, Erie and Crawford Counties), the prime sponsor of HB 767, says the Law didn’t do enough to ensure that consumers would actually receive the notice. “What we found as that some dealers would purchase the car from the manufacturer and strip the disclosure and resell the car to an unsuspecting customer.”

With the provisions of HB 767 added, the PA Lemon Law now requires all dealers and other classified sellers, to disclose the “lemon” history of a used car and also to obtain a signature from the buyer or lessee before the sale/lease. “Requiring a written disclosure from each purchaser, lessee and transferee for the life of the vehicle, ensures that all parties know exactly what they are doing before the sale is finalized.” says Evans. Lemon Law Attorney and Automobile Consumer Advocate Craig Thor Kimmel, a legal consultant to the House Consumer Affairs Committee, says the change will provide immediate benefits to used car purchasers. “The amendment clearly spells out the responsibilities of anyone selling a lemon buy-back in Pennsylvania,” says Kimmel, adding, “With used cars purchases on the upswing, the law did not adequately protect consumers. Now the consumer will be told what they are buying before the sale, and dealers and other sellers are held accountable if they don’t do what they are required to.”

If a manufacturer or dealer fails to comply with the disclosure requirements, and/or the consumer is not notified in the way specified, the dealer or seller faces stiff civil penalties of $2,000 per car, and must offer the purchaser or lessee their choice of a refund or a comparable vehicle without charge.

As added protection, the amendment mandates that manufacturers apply for a branded lemon title from PennDOT before the car can be resold, leased or transferred in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. The title branding then remains throughout the life of the vehicle and cannot be removed. For more information on consumers’ rights under the Pennsylvania Lemon Law, including cost-free legal representation, consumers can visit Lemon Law or call 1-800-LEMON-LAW (1-800-536-6652).
 

Popularity: 78% [?]