Lemon Law Blog

GREENSBURG MAN FIGHTS BACK OVER BROKEN MOTORCYCLE

GREENSBURG (KDKA, 7/11/08) ― With gas prices up, motorcycle sales are rising too. Some motorcycles can get fifty, even sixty miles per gallon, but what if you run into trouble? If your motorcycle turns out to be a lemon, the Pennsylvania Lemon Law doesn’t cover motorcycles, so what can you do? Here’s how one Greensburg rider fought back and won.

Brian Markiewicz of Norvelt spent close to $15,000 two years ago for his motorcycle, a brand new Yamaha Roadster, but his problems began the day he bought it.

“On the way home, it would pop back through the carburetor, hesitate and stall,” explained Markiewicz.

Markiewicz says it’s a problem that’s caused him more than a few close calls, but even though he took his bike back to the dealer for repairs at least seven times, nothing was done that fixed the problem with his bike.

Brian Markiewicz found help through Pennsylvania lemon law attorneys, Kimmel and Silverman. Brian learned that even though the state lemon law doesn’t cover motorcycles, there is a federal law that does.

“There is still recourse if you have a motorcycle that’s not working the way it should and it hasn’t been repaired by the manufacturer,” explained Brian’s attorney, Kimmel & Silverman Pittsburgh Managing Attorney Christina Gill Roseman.

It’s the Magnuson Moss Warranty Act, a law that covers not only motorcycles but computers, ATVs, any product that is under warranty, has problems and those problems aren’t fixed in a reasonable period of time. Usually three or more attempts to fix the problem is considered reasonable.

Attorney Christina Gill Roseman took Brian’s case to court. Arbitrators awarded Brian a settlement of $3,644 for diminished value of his motorcycle due to the unfixed problem.

“I keep the bike and I can have it repaired by anybody else or trade the bike or get rid of it or whatever I want to do with it, ” said Markiewicz.

Not only did Brian win a money settlement, he was awarded attorney fees as well. That’s because under the Magnuson Moss Warranty Act, consumers like Brian Markiewicz who fight back and win don’t pay.

“These are fee shifting statutes, “explained Gill Roseman. “That means if the plaintiff is successful, the manufacturer pays the fees and costs associated with their case.”

“So far, ” said Markiewicz, “it hasn’t cost me a penny. I am amazed.”

The moral of this story for consumers is if you have a product under warranty and can’t get satisfaction with repairs, you can take the company to court at a price you can afford. Nothing!

Contact Kimmel & Silverman at 1-800 LEMON LAW (1-800-536-6652) or click here.

To watch the story, click here

Popularity: 5% [?]

We are very proud of our website. Since it’s inception over ten years ago as the first site dealing specifically with lemon law and breach of warranty rights, we have provided information to more than 20 million visitors.  We have been recognized by many organizations for providing comprehensive and useful information to both distressed drivers who already have a lemon car and potential car-buyers who are looking to buy a car without being taken for a ride.

That being said, it often surprises us when folks reach out to us for assistance and information, and then proceed to tell us that they think they will be able to handle it on their own through the dealership.  That would be okay–if the dealer was the defendant, but they are not.  In most cases, dealerships have NO authority to offer a consumer a buy back or an MSRP to MSRP swap (not a trade, but a swap). In addition, most consumers have

**NO access to the manufacturer’s legal counsel.  Sure, you can call the customer service hotline and receive a case number, but what does that mean?  And, who are you talking to on the other line? In most cases, this is a pacifier.

**NO true knowledge of the last chance letter we frequently see on websites. Consumers should not send a last chance letter on their own.  Why are you only giving the consumer one last chance to fix the problem, when there is no guarantee that you will get a new car or buyback.  This is a law; it is not a guarantee.  Plus, you are creating a hostile environment between you and the dealership.  You need to speak to a lawyer first before issuing such a letter. 

**NO access to technical service bulletins, recalls, or case study to determine if the problems you are experiencing are common among the masses.  Plus, law firms offer ASE-certified experts who will write expert reports on cars and their conditions–at NO COST TO THE CONSUMER.

**NO ability to enforce the Magnuson Moss Warranty Act.  Yes, dealers are required to discuss the Lemon Law with you when you purchase a car.  But, if your problems fall outside the lemon law provisions, ask them about the Mag Moss and they will stare at you like you are speaking another language?  Do you think the dealer is going to offer you thousands of dollars to reflect the diminished value of the car? No and they are not required to.  If you have a car with 50,000 miles on it, what can a dealer do for you?  An oil change, a monthly payment, at the most an extended warranty, but you are entitled to SO MUCH MORE.

Our goal is to educate you about your rights so that you will enforce them if you need to.  However, the beauty of these laws is that they offer provisions which put you on EQUAL FOOTING with the billion-dollar manufacturers?  These provisions provide completely free legal help, either through us or another Firm.  Take advantage of them.  Let those who are more knowledgeable help you.  I can’t tell you the number of folks who tried to do this on their own, failed, and then virtually voided their rights.  If you are going to fight, make sure you have someone in your corner who knows how to battle. OK, I’m stepping off my soapbox now.

A quick programming note for viewers in the Delaware Valley–Craig Kimmel will be discussing the 2008 Car Complaint Index and the Center for Auto Safety’s Best Bets tonight on the Fox 29 News at 5.

Popularity: 33% [?]

Your help is urgently needed on important legislation impacting on all consumers. The Arbitration Fairness Act of 2007 (House Bill H.R. 3010 and Senate Bill S. 1782) would outlaw mandatory arbitration agreements for consumer contracts.

As you know, businesses and corporations bury binding mandatory arbitration clauses in contracts for countless products and services including credit cards, new homes, and cars. These clauses force you to surrender your rights to a privatized system known as arbitration. Corporate wrongdoers and fraudulent companies protect themselves from being held accountable by hiding behind BMA clauses inserted in fine print.

Although states have tried to address this problem through their consumer protection laws, the courts have interpreted the current onerous Federal Arbitration Act to trump state laws leaving consumers very little recourse. Historically, the FAA intentionally omitted ordinary citizens from these types of agreements. The Arbitration Fairness Act would return this statute to its original intention and omit consumer, medical, franchise, and employment agreements from these pre-dispute agreements. Americans are entitled to a trial by jury; pre-dispute mandatory arbitration agreements give only one side the upper hand.

The Pennsylvania Trial Lawyers Association urges you to write to your Senators and Representatives and tell them to cosponsor this legislation. A sample letter is included below that you are welcomed and encouraged to modify. You can locate mailing info. for your Senators and Representatives by going to www.congress.org

**Sample Letter**

Re: BMA Clauses Hurt Average Americans

Dear ___________ :

I urge you to cosponsor the Arbitration Fairness Act of 2007, which would ban pre-dispute Binding Mandatory Arbitration clauses in consumer and employment contracts. This unfair practice stacks the deck against average Americans trying to hold powerful interests accountable when they have been hurt through no fault of their own.

Buried within the fine print of many consumer contracts for credit cards, home-building contracts and car purchases are clauses that force consumers to give up their rights to seek justice through the courts. These clauses have hurt thousands of Americans already, and will continue to do so if Congress doesn’t pass the Arbitration Fairness Act of 2007.

I ask you to consider the story of Guy Combs who was hurt by a Binding Mandatory Arbitration clause:

Vietnam veteran Guy Combs bought a house in his hometown of Alpine, Texas. After living in the house for only four years, Guy discovered that his home had severe structural problems. He asked his builder to repair the damage, but the builder offered to pay only $3,000 for $300,000 worth of damages. When Guy bought the home he unknowingly signed an arbitration agreement, which was not explained to him at the time. Therefore, he was forced to settle his dispute in arbitration.

Guy describes arbitration as “third world justice.” The arbitrator refused to recognize that there were damages to Guy’s home despite the testimony of twenty expert witnesses that Guy hired. The arbitration process cost him $77,000. The arbitrator billed him a flat fee of $150,000 but after negotiations he brought the fee down to $50,000 plus interest. Guy did not want to lose his ranch and, since there was no means for appeal, he paid the fees.

Guy has a PhD from Brown and he thought he understood our legal system, until his rights were eviscerated by arbitration.

Guy Combs is just one of thousands of victims of Arbitration. These clauses, buried within many consumer contracts for credit cards, nursing homes and car purchases, stack the deck against ordinary Americans and force consumers to give up their rights before a dispute even occurs.

Again, I urge you to cosponsor the Arbitration Fairness Act of 2007 which bans this unfair practice and allows hardworking Americans to seek justice through the courts, often the only place they can face powerful interests on a level playing field.

Sincerely,

_________________
For more informaiton, ccontact PaTLA 121 South Broad Street, Suite 600 Philadelphia, PA, 19107
Tel 215.546.6451 Fax 215.546.5430

Popularity: 41% [?]